PBS’s new three-part series about the life and work of former Secretary of State George P. Shultz was produced by Free to Choose Media, a nonprofit that “focuses on issues of personal, economic, and political freedom” and was built on the shoulders of a series hosted by economist Milton Friedman. It was funded in part by the foundation arm of a company of which Shultz was president, by conservative businessman and former Commerce Secretary Peter G. Peterson, and by Charles Schwab, among others. All of those influences show in the rather rosy Turmoil and Triumph: The George Shultz Years—which airs at 10 PM on July 12, 19, and 26—but the series is still sometimes a revealing portrait of Washington service, no matter your relation to the show’s politics or that of its backers.
“If the President asks you to do something and you feel you’re reasonably competent to do it, then I feel as though you have a duty to serve,” Shultz says at the beginning of the first episode. It’s a rather humble explanation for taking government office, but what makes it interesting is how Shultz defines service, less as executing presidential commands than as offering independent counsel. The series makes much of his work convincing President Reagan to engage directly and personally with the Soviet Union and to disentangle himself from Filipino president Ferdinand Marcos.
But given that approach to government service, it’s odd that the series doesn’t give Shultz more room to discuss certain key moments in his career. It’s nice to know that the narrator thinks that even though Shultz wanted American troops in Lebanon, “he has had nothing to do with tying them down to an exposed position that’s difficult to defend.” But even if Shultz isn’t responsible for strategic decisions, why make a portentous statement like that if you’ve got the man himself around to discuss how he feels about the barracks bombing? And why show students asking Shultz questions about moral decision-making and, instead of having him answer them, show him prepping a family steak recipe with his kids? There’s nothing wrong with the latter sort of scene for color, but not if it substitutes for more salient discussions about Shultz’s role as a presidential adviser.
And some of the color—especially about Shultz’s early career at the University of Chicago—is quite illuminating. The National Black MBA Association, for example, has its origins at Chicago’s business school in part because, in an effort to make the school more diverse, Shultz asked businesses to put up money for scholarships for African-American students and to guarantee them summer jobs so more of them could afford to pursue business degrees. Details like that reveal Shultz as the somewhat idiosyncratic Republican that he is. More about the George Shultz who favors recreational-drug legalization and ending the embargo against Cuba in the belief that free trade will weaken the Castro regime (especially because Shultz is the Secretary of State with the most background in economics) would have been fun. But at least we get shots of Imelda Marcos’s shoes and trade liberalization with Japan. And a lot of kosher salt on that steak for flavor.
Pushback as Public Service
A PBS series about former Secretary of State George P. Shultz raises questions about how best to serve the President
PBS’s new three-part series about the life and work of former Secretary of State George P. Shultz was produced by Free to Choose Media, a nonprofit that “focuses on issues of personal, economic, and political freedom” and was built on the shoulders of a series hosted by economist Milton Friedman. It was funded in part by the foundation arm of a company of which Shultz was president, by conservative businessman and former Commerce Secretary Peter G. Peterson, and by Charles Schwab, among others. All of those influences show in the rather rosy Turmoil and Triumph: The George Shultz Years—which airs at 10 PM on July 12, 19, and 26—but the series is still sometimes a revealing portrait of Washington service, no matter your relation to the show’s politics or that of its backers.
“If the President asks you to do something and you feel you’re reasonably competent to do it, then I feel as though you have a duty to serve,” Shultz says at the beginning of the first episode. It’s a rather humble explanation for taking government office, but what makes it interesting is how Shultz defines service, less as executing presidential commands than as offering independent counsel. The series makes much of his work convincing President Reagan to engage directly and personally with the Soviet Union and to disentangle himself from Filipino president Ferdinand Marcos.
But given that approach to government service, it’s odd that the series doesn’t give Shultz more room to discuss certain key moments in his career. It’s nice to know that the narrator thinks that even though Shultz wanted American troops in Lebanon, “he has had nothing to do with tying them down to an exposed position that’s difficult to defend.” But even if Shultz isn’t responsible for strategic decisions, why make a portentous statement like that if you’ve got the man himself around to discuss how he feels about the barracks bombing? And why show students asking Shultz questions about moral decision-making and, instead of having him answer them, show him prepping a family steak recipe with his kids? There’s nothing wrong with the latter sort of scene for color, but not if it substitutes for more salient discussions about Shultz’s role as a presidential adviser.
And some of the color—especially about Shultz’s early career at the University of Chicago—is quite illuminating. The National Black MBA Association, for example, has its origins at Chicago’s business school in part because, in an effort to make the school more diverse, Shultz asked businesses to put up money for scholarships for African-American students and to guarantee them summer jobs so more of them could afford to pursue business degrees. Details like that reveal Shultz as the somewhat idiosyncratic Republican that he is. More about the George Shultz who favors recreational-drug legalization and ending the embargo against Cuba in the belief that free trade will weaken the Castro regime (especially because Shultz is the Secretary of State with the most background in economics) would have been fun. But at least we get shots of Imelda Marcos’s shoes and trade liberalization with Japan. And a lot of kosher salt on that steak for flavor.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
What Happens After We Die? These UVA Researchers Are Investigating It.
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
USDA Spent $16,400 on Banners to Honor Trump and Lincoln
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
Why a Lost DC Novel Is Getting New Attention
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
More from News & Politics
How to Pick a Good Title-and-Settlement Company in the DC Area
Weird Press Conference Ends Trump’s Vacation From Offering Medical Advice, Kimmel Goes Back to Work Tonight, and DC Man Arrested for Shining Laser Pointer at Marine One
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
Nominations Are Now Open for 500 Most Influential People List
Trump and Musk Reunite, Administration Will Claim Link Between Tylenol and Autism, and Foo Fighters Play Surprise Show in DC
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
A New Exhibition Near the White House Takes a High-Tech Approach to a Fundamental Question: What Is the American Dream?
Want to See What Could Be Ovechkin’s Last Game in DC? It’s Going to Cost You.