While the candid characterizations of foreign leaders by diplomats (“thin-skinned” Nicolas Sarkozy,“corrupt” Vladimir Putin) have received much of the attention from the recent WikiLeaks document dump, hidden in the flood of cables are behind-the-scenes dramas involving Washington power players.
National Journal’sBruce Stokes learned in the documents that, while he was the magazine’s international-economics correspondent, he was unknowingly the central character in an apparent Chinese espionage plot.
In 2009, five State Department employees who were negotiating with China on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions evidently received e-mails bearing Stokes’s name and contact information. The subject line of his purported messages—“China and Climate Change”—was germane and innocuous enough to pass as a journalist’s query. For good measure, Stokes’s cyber-imitator included comments in the e-mails related to the recipients’ jobs, according to a State Department cable documenting the incident. The e-mails, though, weren’t from the offices of National Journal. Instead they were a ruse known as “spear phishing,” in which the sender imitates someone the recipients may know, luring them to open the message and any attachments, which usually contain a computer virus.
Stokes was a well-thought-out target: He has connections to the diplomatic corps—including his wife, Wendy Sherman, the Clinton administration’s policy coordinator on North Korea and now a principal at the Albright Stonebridge Group—and he has known the US climate-change envoy, Todd Stern, for years.
The e-mails that seemed to come from Stokes contained a virus that, if opened, would have burrowed an electronic tunnel to the host computer, letting the intruder root around in the owner’s files and siphon off copies.
Whether anyone opened the attachments is unclear. The State Department cable describing the incident says the targeted computers were using an electronic “patch” that would have blocked the infection.
Striking a diplomatic tone in the cable, the State Department stops short of blaming China for the attempted theft. But the cable notes that at the same time the United States and China were “conducting specific negotiations” on greenhouse-gas emissions, “evidence of an attempt to gain unauthorized entry to computer systems operated by [State Department] personnel involved with climate change issues has surfaced.” What a coincidence!
National Journal editor Charlie Green was alerted to the incident not by the government but by his son, who saw the reference in the WikiLeaks coverage, which named only the publication involved, not the reporter. “I see that the Chinese government is using your magazine as a tool for international espionage,” he wrote his dad in an e-mail.
Green then e-mailed the news to National Journal columnists past and present. By the process of elimination, the field was barrowed down to Stokes.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is “spear phishing” now the greatest compliment a government can give a reporter?
This article first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Washingtonian.
Chinese Spies May Have Tried to Impersonate Journalist Bruce Stokes
Virus-bearing messages were sent in his name from a fake account.
While the candid characterizations of foreign leaders by diplomats (“thin-skinned” Nicolas Sarkozy,“corrupt” Vladimir Putin) have received much of the attention from the recent WikiLeaks document dump, hidden in the flood of cables are behind-the-scenes dramas involving Washington power players.
National Journal’s Bruce Stokes learned in the documents that, while he was the magazine’s international-economics correspondent, he was unknowingly the central character in an apparent Chinese espionage plot.
In 2009, five State Department employees who were negotiating with China on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions evidently received e-mails bearing Stokes’s name and contact information. The subject line of his purported messages—“China and Climate Change”—was germane and innocuous enough to pass as a journalist’s query. For good measure, Stokes’s cyber-imitator included comments in the e-mails related to the recipients’ jobs, according to a State Department cable documenting the incident. The e-mails, though, weren’t from the offices of National Journal. Instead they were a ruse known as “spear phishing,” in which the sender imitates someone the recipients may know, luring them to open the message and any attachments, which usually contain a computer virus.
Stokes was a well-thought-out target: He has connections to the diplomatic corps—including his wife, Wendy Sherman, the Clinton administration’s policy coordinator on North Korea and now a principal at the Albright Stonebridge Group—and he has known the US climate-change envoy, Todd Stern, for years.
The e-mails that seemed to come from Stokes contained a virus that, if opened, would have burrowed an electronic tunnel to the host computer, letting the intruder root around in the owner’s files and siphon off copies.
Whether anyone opened the attachments is unclear. The State Department cable describing the incident says the targeted computers were using an electronic “patch” that would have blocked the infection.
Striking a diplomatic tone in the cable, the State Department stops short of blaming China for the attempted theft. But the cable notes that at the same time the United States and China were “conducting specific negotiations” on greenhouse-gas emissions, “evidence of an attempt to gain unauthorized entry to computer systems operated by [State Department] personnel involved with climate change issues has surfaced.” What a coincidence!
National Journal editor Charlie Green was alerted to the incident not by the government but by his son, who saw the reference in the WikiLeaks coverage, which named only the publication involved, not the reporter. “I see that the Chinese government is using your magazine as a tool for international espionage,” he wrote his dad in an e-mail.
Green then e-mailed the news to National Journal columnists past and present. By the process of elimination, the field was barrowed down to Stokes.
If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, is “spear phishing” now the greatest compliment a government can give a reporter?
This article first appeared in the February 2011 issue of The Washingtonian.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
What Happens After We Die? These UVA Researchers Are Investigating It.
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
USDA Spent $16,400 on Banners to Honor Trump and Lincoln
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
Why a Lost DC Novel Is Getting New Attention
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
More from News & Politics
How to Pick a Good Title-and-Settlement Company in the DC Area
Weird Press Conference Ends Trump’s Vacation From Offering Medical Advice, Kimmel Goes Back to Work Tonight, and DC Man Arrested for Shining Laser Pointer at Marine One
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
Nominations Are Now Open for 500 Most Influential People List
Trump and Musk Reunite, Administration Will Claim Link Between Tylenol and Autism, and Foo Fighters Play Surprise Show in DC
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
A New Exhibition Near the White House Takes a High-Tech Approach to a Fundamental Question: What Is the American Dream?
Want to See What Could Be Ovechkin’s Last Game in DC? It’s Going to Cost You.