A report released Thursday by the auditor of the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program—better known as TARP—targets the DC-based law firm Venable for its billing practices. This isn’t the first time Venable, which was one of several firms contracted by Treasury to work on the bank bailout program, has come under fire for its billing.
Today’s report by the Special Inspector General for TARP finds possible problems with $676,840—or about two-thirds—of more than $1 million in legal fees that Venable billed to the Treasury Department. Venable’s invoices were vague, the report contends, with the firm’s use of “block-billing,” or single charges that included several tasks without specifying the time spent on each, singled out as especially egregious. Auditors also place blame on Treasury officials for lax oversight of the legal tab. Ultimately, though, they could not determine whether Venable did anything improper because the bills were too vague to support such a conclusion.
Venable’s billing practices were at the center of another controversy in 2007, when an investigation by DC Auditor Deborah Nichols concluded the firm had overcharged the city more than $250,000 for its work on securing land for the new Nationals baseball stadium. That report found that Venable had charged higher rates than were laid out in its 2005 contract, and also improperly billed the city for expenses such as meals.
Then-DC Council chairman (now DC mayor) Vincent Gray responded that he had never seen “a contract more poorly administered than this one.” At the time, Venable told the Legal Times that it had agreed to cut about $300,000 off the city’s legal tab to correct any errors.
Washingtonian.com has reached out to Venable for comment on its billing practices, and we will update when we hear back.
UPDATE: In an e-mailed statement, Venable says the firm "fully cooperated with the Treasury Department's reporting requirements" and is confident that "Treasury received fair value" for the services provided. The firm's spokeswoman did not return a call seeking comment on Venable's billing practices in general.
Venable Under Fire for TARP Billing Practices
Not the first time the firm has run into trouble
A report released Thursday by the auditor of the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program—better known as TARP—targets the DC-based law firm Venable for its billing practices. This isn’t the first time Venable, which was one of several firms contracted by Treasury to work on the bank bailout program, has come under fire for its billing.
Today’s report by the Special Inspector General for TARP finds possible problems with $676,840—or about two-thirds—of more than $1 million in legal fees that Venable billed to the Treasury Department. Venable’s invoices were vague, the report contends, with the firm’s use of “block-billing,” or single charges that included several tasks without specifying the time spent on each, singled out as especially egregious. Auditors also place blame on Treasury officials for lax oversight of the legal tab. Ultimately, though, they could not determine whether Venable did anything improper because the bills were too vague to support such a conclusion.
Venable’s billing practices were at the center of another controversy in 2007, when an investigation by DC Auditor Deborah Nichols concluded the firm had overcharged the city more than $250,000 for its work on securing land for the new Nationals baseball stadium. That report found that Venable had charged higher rates than were laid out in its 2005 contract, and also improperly billed the city for expenses such as meals.
Then-DC Council chairman (now DC mayor) Vincent Gray responded that he had never seen “a contract more poorly administered than this one.” At the time, Venable told the Legal Times that it had agreed to cut about $300,000 off the city’s legal tab to correct any errors.
Washingtonian.com has reached out to Venable for comment on its billing practices, and we will update when we hear back.
UPDATE: In an e-mailed statement, Venable says the firm "fully cooperated with the Treasury Department's reporting requirements" and is confident that "Treasury received fair value" for the services provided. The firm's spokeswoman did not return a call seeking comment on Venable's billing practices in general.
Subscribe to Washingtonian
Follow Washingtonian on Twitter
More>> Capital Comment Blog | News & Politics | Party Photos
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
What Happens After We Die? These UVA Researchers Are Investigating It.
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
USDA Spent $16,400 on Banners to Honor Trump and Lincoln
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
Why a Lost DC Novel Is Getting New Attention
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
More from News & Politics
How to Pick a Good Title-and-Settlement Company in the DC Area
Weird Press Conference Ends Trump’s Vacation From Offering Medical Advice, Kimmel Goes Back to Work Tonight, and DC Man Arrested for Shining Laser Pointer at Marine One
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
Nominations Are Now Open for 500 Most Influential People List
Trump and Musk Reunite, Administration Will Claim Link Between Tylenol and Autism, and Foo Fighters Play Surprise Show in DC
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
A New Exhibition Near the White House Takes a High-Tech Approach to a Fundamental Question: What Is the American Dream?
Want to See What Could Be Ovechkin’s Last Game in DC? It’s Going to Cost You.