The suspense continues over how the Supreme Court will rule in cases deciding the
constitutionality of California’s same-sex marriage ban and the Defense of Marriage
Act. But the court has handed down two other highly anticipated rulings this week,
both regarding the treatment of racial minorities—and both involving the same lawyer, Bert Rein.
Though Rein cofounded the firm Wiley Rein in 1983, he’s often overshadowed by its
other name partner: the higher-profile, former FCC chairman Richard Wiley. But this week, Rein is the one in the spotlight.
The former deputy assistant secretary of state during the Nixon administration focuses
on antitrust, commercial litigation, and food and drug law. Rein is certainly not
known as a Supreme Court lawyer, but this term, he found himself arguing twice before
the justices—his first ever appearances at the high court.
In his first case, he advocated for Abigail Fisher, a Caucasian woman who claimed the affirmative action policy at the University of
Texas prevented her from being admitted. In his second case, he argued on behalf of
Shelby County, Alabama, that a key piece of the Voting Rights Act—the landmark civil
rights legislation passed to combat voter discrimination—should not have been reauthorized
by Congress.
The high court—sort of—decided Fisher v. University of Texas at Austinyesterday. In a 7-1 decision, with Elena Kagan recusing herself, the justices sent the case back to the lower appellate court to
reevaluate the college’s policy. It was neither a loss nor a win for Rein.
But today, Rein got a clear victory when the justices decided Shelby County v. Holder. They determined in a 5-4 ruling that section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.
The historic decision will be among the most
controversial of the term and has already been denounced by President Obama, who called it “a setback” for
efforts to end discrimination.
So how did Rein, a newbie at the high court, land such big cases? Edward Blum, a former stockbroker backed by
conservative donors and the founder of the Project
on Fair
Representation, found
plaintiffs for both Fisher and Shelby County, convinced them to file their lawsuits,
and linked them up with Rein. Blum reportedly
first got connected with Wiley Rein, widely regarded as a
Republican-leaning firm,
nearly two decades ago when he himself was a plaintiff in a case involving a Texas
redistricting plan,
a matter handled by another attorney at Wiley Rein.
So, for now, it’s Bert Rein’s week. But the attention will certainly shift tomorrow,
when the justices appear poised to finally hand down the same-sex marriage rulings.
Meet the Lawyer Involved in Both of This Week’s Big Race-Based Supreme Court Cases
How did Bert Rein land such high-profile projects?
The suspense continues over how the Supreme Court will rule in cases deciding the
constitutionality of California’s same-sex marriage ban and the Defense of Marriage
Act. But the court has handed down two other highly anticipated rulings this week,
both regarding the treatment of racial minorities—and both involving the same lawyer,
Bert Rein.
Though Rein cofounded the firm Wiley Rein in 1983, he’s often overshadowed by its
other name partner: the higher-profile, former FCC chairman
Richard Wiley. But this week, Rein is the one in the spotlight.
The former deputy assistant secretary of state during the Nixon administration focuses
on antitrust, commercial litigation, and food and drug law. Rein is certainly not
known as a Supreme Court lawyer, but this term, he found himself arguing twice before
the justices—his first ever appearances at the high court.
In his first case, he advocated for
Abigail Fisher, a Caucasian woman who claimed the affirmative action policy at the University of
Texas prevented her from being admitted. In his second case, he argued on behalf of
Shelby County, Alabama, that a key piece of the Voting Rights Act—the landmark civil
rights legislation passed to combat voter discrimination—should not have been reauthorized
by Congress.
The high court—sort of—decided
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin yesterday. In a 7-1 decision, with
Elena Kagan recusing herself, the justices sent the case back to the lower appellate court to
reevaluate the college’s policy. It was neither a loss nor a win for Rein.
But today, Rein got a clear victory when the justices decided
Shelby County v. Holder. They determined in a 5-4 ruling that section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.
The historic decision will be among the most
controversial of the term and has already been denounced by
President Obama, who called it “a setback” for
efforts to end discrimination.
So how did Rein, a newbie at the high court, land such big cases?
Edward Blum, a former stockbroker backed by
conservative donors and the founder of the Project
on Fair
Representation, found
plaintiffs for both
Fisher and
Shelby County, convinced them to file their lawsuits,
and linked them up with Rein. Blum reportedly
first got connected with Wiley Rein, widely regarded as a
Republican-leaning firm,
nearly two decades ago when he himself was a plaintiff in a
case involving a Texas
redistricting plan,
a matter handled by another attorney at Wiley Rein.
So, for now, it’s Bert Rein’s week. But the attention will certainly shift tomorrow,
when the justices appear poised to finally hand down the same-sex marriage rulings.
Marisa M. Kashino joined Washingtonian in 2009 and was a senior editor until 2022.
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
What Happens After We Die? These UVA Researchers Are Investigating It.
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
USDA Spent $16,400 on Banners to Honor Trump and Lincoln
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
Why a Lost DC Novel Is Getting New Attention
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
More from News & Politics
How to Pick a Good Title-and-Settlement Company in the DC Area
Weird Press Conference Ends Trump’s Vacation From Offering Medical Advice, Kimmel Goes Back to Work Tonight, and DC Man Arrested for Shining Laser Pointer at Marine One
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
Nominations Are Now Open for 500 Most Influential People List
Trump and Musk Reunite, Administration Will Claim Link Between Tylenol and Autism, and Foo Fighters Play Surprise Show in DC
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
A New Exhibition Near the White House Takes a High-Tech Approach to a Fundamental Question: What Is the American Dream?
Want to See What Could Be Ovechkin’s Last Game in DC? It’s Going to Cost You.