A federal judge on Thursday struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage, writing that the state constitution amendment adopted by voters in 2006 violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
The ruling issued by Judge Arenda Wright Allen of US District Court in Norfolk, is the latest federal rebuke of a state-level prohibition on same-sex marriage and is certain to push marriage equality toward the Supreme Court again. Wright Allen stayed her ruling pending an appeal, meaning that gay and lesbian couples in Virginia cannot start marrying just yet.
Although her ruling cannot take effect, Wright Allen’s opinion was particularly strong, opening with a long quote from Mildred Loving, a plaintiff in the 1967 Supreme Court case that overturned Virginia’s ban on mixed-race marriages.
“Justice has often been forged from fires of indignities and prejudices suffered,” Wright Allen wrote. “Our triumphs that celebrate the freedom of choice are hallowed. We have arrived upon another moment in history when We the People becomes more inclusive, and our freedom more perfect.”
The case, Bostic v. Rainey, was filed last year by a gay couple in Norfolk whose request for a marriage license was turned down. Virgina’s new attorney general, Mark Herring, said on January 23 that the state would no longer defend the marriage amendment, a reversal from his predecessor, Ken Cuccinelli. The plaintiffs are being represented by David Boies and former Solicitor General Ted Olson, who also represented the California couples in last year’s Supreme Court case that brought down that state’s same-sex marriage ban.
“This decision is a victory for the Constitution and for treating everyone equally under the law,” said Herring, who filed a brief in support of the plaintiffs after switching the state’s position. “The legal process will continue to play out in the months to come, but this decision shows that Virginia, like America, is coming to a better place in recognizing that every Virginian deserves to be treated equally and fairly.”
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Virginia’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban Is Unconstitutional, Says Federal Judge
The ruling overturns the ban adopted in 2006, but won’t take effect pending an appeal.
A federal judge on Thursday struck down Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage, writing that the state constitution amendment adopted by voters in 2006 violates the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.
The ruling issued by Judge Arenda Wright Allen of US District Court in Norfolk, is the latest federal rebuke of a state-level prohibition on same-sex marriage and is certain to push marriage equality toward the Supreme Court again. Wright Allen stayed her ruling pending an appeal, meaning that gay and lesbian couples in Virginia cannot start marrying just yet.
Although her ruling cannot take effect, Wright Allen’s opinion was particularly strong, opening with a long quote from Mildred Loving, a plaintiff in the 1967 Supreme Court case that overturned Virginia’s ban on mixed-race marriages.
“Justice has often been forged from fires of indignities and prejudices suffered,” Wright Allen wrote. “Our triumphs that celebrate the freedom of choice are hallowed. We have arrived upon another moment in history when We the People becomes more inclusive, and our freedom more perfect.”
The case, Bostic v. Rainey, was filed last year by a gay couple in Norfolk whose request for a marriage license was turned down. Virgina’s new attorney general, Mark Herring, said on January 23 that the state would no longer defend the marriage amendment, a reversal from his predecessor, Ken Cuccinelli. The plaintiffs are being represented by David Boies and former Solicitor General Ted Olson, who also represented the California couples in last year’s Supreme Court case that brought down that state’s same-sex marriage ban.
“This decision is a victory for the Constitution and for treating everyone equally under the law,” said Herring, who filed a brief in support of the plaintiffs after switching the state’s position. “The legal process will continue to play out in the months to come, but this decision shows that Virginia, like America, is coming to a better place in recognizing that every Virginian deserves to be treated equally and fairly.”
Bostic Opinion by Benjamin Freed
Benjamin Freed joined Washingtonian in August 2013 and covers politics, business, and media. He was previously the editor of DCist and has also written for Washington City Paper, the New York Times, the New Republic, Slate, and BuzzFeed. He lives in Adams Morgan.
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
What Happens After We Die? These UVA Researchers Are Investigating It.
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
USDA Spent $16,400 on Banners to Honor Trump and Lincoln
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
Why a Lost DC Novel Is Getting New Attention
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
More from News & Politics
How to Pick a Good Title-and-Settlement Company in the DC Area
Weird Press Conference Ends Trump’s Vacation From Offering Medical Advice, Kimmel Goes Back to Work Tonight, and DC Man Arrested for Shining Laser Pointer at Marine One
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
Nominations Are Now Open for 500 Most Influential People List
Trump and Musk Reunite, Administration Will Claim Link Between Tylenol and Autism, and Foo Fighters Play Surprise Show in DC
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
A New Exhibition Near the White House Takes a High-Tech Approach to a Fundamental Question: What Is the American Dream?
Want to See What Could Be Ovechkin’s Last Game in DC? It’s Going to Cost You.