The plot of federal land where the Eisenhower Memorial is slated to be built. Photograph by Carol Ross Joynt.
The seemingly endless pursuit to build a viable memorial to President Dwight D. Eisenhower near the Mall took a new turn on Thursday as Gehry Partners, whose controversial design has pleased no one with the power to approve it, proposed a “significant change” that, they hoped, would finally allow the project to go forward.
The new proposal eliminates two of the metal tapestries that would enclose part of the park-like arrangement, leaving only the large tapestry that spans the rear of the site.
“Since we were here in April, we’ve worked hard to meet the planning goals of the Commission as set forth in the last meeting,” Gehry architect Craig Webb told the gathered members of the National Capital Planning Commission. He said the architectural team has been “working with” the NCPC staff and presented to them “several different design ideas.” Only the one was presented at the meeting.
Other smaller changes include moving two supporting columns and modifications to the landscaping at the four-acre site on Independence Avenue in a wedge between the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Education Department, the FAA, and the William J. Cohen Federal Building.
Webb said this revision was intended not to take a “radical” direction” but “to move forward with this project to honor Eisenhower.”
That sentiment was seconded by commission member Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Relations, but with a further, “out-of-the-box” suggestion to build the memorial “sans the tapestries.”
“I would not want to lose the Gehry design as it is forever, but at the same time we have an obligation, after 15 years, to get this thing going,” Webb said, adding that this plan could also augment a “staged” fundraising effort.
Issa, who visited the memorial site before Thursday’s meeting, also observed that, at this point, “a toilet facility would be an improvement” of the “blighted” plot of land.
The presentation was informational only, and there was no vote by the NCPC members. That will come later after staff have analyzed the proposals.
The Incredible Shrinking Eisenhower Memorial
A proposed “significant change” to the design would eliminate two controversial tapestries.
The seemingly endless pursuit to build a viable memorial to President Dwight D. Eisenhower near the Mall took a new turn on Thursday as Gehry Partners, whose controversial design has pleased no one with the power to approve it, proposed a “significant change” that, they hoped, would finally allow the project to go forward.
The new proposal eliminates two of the metal tapestries that would enclose part of the park-like arrangement, leaving only the large tapestry that spans the rear of the site.
“Since we were here in April, we’ve worked hard to meet the planning goals of the Commission as set forth in the last meeting,” Gehry architect Craig Webb told the gathered members of the National Capital Planning Commission. He said the architectural team has been “working with” the NCPC staff and presented to them “several different design ideas.” Only the one was presented at the meeting.
Other smaller changes include moving two supporting columns and modifications to the landscaping at the four-acre site on Independence Avenue in a wedge between the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Education Department, the FAA, and the William J. Cohen Federal Building.
Webb said this revision was intended not to take a “radical” direction” but “to move forward with this project to honor Eisenhower.”
That sentiment was seconded by commission member Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Relations, but with a further, “out-of-the-box” suggestion to build the memorial “sans the tapestries.”
“I would not want to lose the Gehry design as it is forever, but at the same time we have an obligation, after 15 years, to get this thing going,” Webb said, adding that this plan could also augment a “staged” fundraising effort.
Issa, who visited the memorial site before Thursday’s meeting, also observed that, at this point, “a toilet facility would be an improvement” of the “blighted” plot of land.
The presentation was informational only, and there was no vote by the NCPC members. That will come later after staff have analyzed the proposals.
Find Carol Ross Joynt on Twitter at @caroljoynt.
Most Popular in News & Politics
See a Spotted Lanternfly? Here’s What to Do.
Meet DC’s 2025 Tech Titans
What Happens After We Die? These UVA Researchers Are Investigating It.
GOP Candidate Quits Virginia Race After Losing Federal Contracting Job, Trump Plans Crackdown on Left Following Kirk’s Death, and Theatre Week Starts Thursday
USDA Spent $16,400 on Banners to Honor Trump and Lincoln
Washingtonian Magazine
September Issue: Style Setters
View IssueSubscribe
Follow Us on Social
Follow Us on Social
Related
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
Why a Lost DC Novel Is Getting New Attention
These Confusing Bands Aren’t Actually From DC
More from News & Politics
How to Pick a Good Title-and-Settlement Company in the DC Area
Weird Press Conference Ends Trump’s Vacation From Offering Medical Advice, Kimmel Goes Back to Work Tonight, and DC Man Arrested for Shining Laser Pointer at Marine One
Why Can You Swim in the Seine but Not the Potomac River?
Nominations Are Now Open for 500 Most Influential People List
Trump and Musk Reunite, Administration Will Claim Link Between Tylenol and Autism, and Foo Fighters Play Surprise Show in DC
This DC Woman Might Owe You Money
A New Exhibition Near the White House Takes a High-Tech Approach to a Fundamental Question: What Is the American Dream?
Want to See What Could Be Ovechkin’s Last Game in DC? It’s Going to Cost You.